By National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on the Independent Evaluation of DC Public Schools
The District of Columbia (DC) has struggled for many years to enhance its public schooling approach. In 2007 the DC govt made a daring switch within the method it governs public schooling with the aim of shaking up the method and bringing new power to efforts to enhance results for college kids. the general public schooling Reform modification Act (PERAA) shifted regulate of the city's public faculties from an elected tuition board to the mayor, built a brand new kingdom division of schooling, created the placement of chancellor, and made different major administration changes.
A Plan for comparing the District of Columbia's Public Schools bargains a framework for comparing the results of PERAA on DC's public colleges. The e-book recommends an assessment application that features a systematic each year public reporting of key info in addition to in-depth reviews of high-priority matters together with: caliber of academics, principals, and different body of workers; caliber of school room educating and studying; ability to serve weak childrens and formative years; advertising of relations and neighborhood engagement; and caliber and fairness of operations, administration, and amenities. As a part of the review application, the Mayor's workplace may still produce an annual report back to the town at the prestige of the general public faculties, together with an research of tendencies and all of the underlying data.
A Plan for comparing the District of Columbia's Public Schools means that D.C. have interaction neighborhood universities, philanthropic businesses, and different associations to strengthen and maintain an infrastructure for ongoing learn and assessment of its public colleges. Any powerful evaluate software needs to be self sustaining of faculty and town leaders and attentive to the desires of all stakeholders. also, its study should still meet the top criteria for technical quality.
Read Online or Download A Plan for Evaluating the District of Columbia's Public Schools: From Impressions to Evidence PDF
Similar assessment books
This renowned textual content publications trainee secondary academics during the instructing specifications for preliminary instructor education and the united kingdom expert criteria for certified instructor prestige (QTS). It specializes in quite a number key subject matters, summarizes key united kingdom academic study, and comprises either reflective workouts and school-based functional initiatives.
Written in easy-to-understand language, this crucial textual content presents a scientific and common sense method of constructing tools for facts assortment and research. This publication can be utilized via either people who find themselves constructing tools for the 1st time and people who are looking to hone their abilities, together with scholars, business enterprise group of workers, application managers, and researchers.
Company education and powerful functionality became significant concerns within the Eighties and '90s. studies of the learning study literature convey that, parallel to the transforming into realization to company education, learn has additionally elevated within the box, giving a greater figuring out of the topic and supplying basic services on which running shoes can construct.
Please look over the questions that persist with and browse the solutions to those who are of curiosity. Q: What does this handbook do? A: This handbook publications the person via designing an assessment. A: Who can use it? A: an individual or excited by comparing expert trammg or inservice teaching programs.
Extra info for A Plan for Evaluating the District of Columbia's Public Schools: From Impressions to Evidence
Structure, politics and policy: The logic of mayoral control. R. C. ), Mayors in the Middle (pp. 221-248). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Moon, B. (2007). Research Analysis: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Â�Teachers: A Global Overview of Current Policies and Practices. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. L. (2007). What is the problem? The challenge of providing Â�effective teachers for all children. The Future of Children, 17(1), 15-43.
P. ). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. S. Congress House Committee on Education and the Workforce. R. L. 107-110, 107th Congress. (2001). S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. H. ), Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System (pp. 250312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.
2007). Standards-Based Reform: Lessons from the Past, Directions for the Future. Paper presented at the Clio at the Table: A Conference on the Uses of History to Inform and Improve Education Policy, Brown University, Providence, RI. , and Duffy, M. (2003). Mapping the landscape of high-stakes testing and accountability programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 4-11. F. (2008). The Race Between Education and Technology. Â�Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. , and Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-Based Reform in the United States: History, Research, and Future Directions.