Radioactive Waste Management: Towards Transparent, by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

By Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

Those workshop proceedings highlight the major volume of labor entire over the last decade in providing obvious, proportionate rules for geological disposal, and identify important alterations among nationwide rules whether those should not in contradiction with foreign guidance. They additionally underline the significance of R&D performed on behalf of the regulator. as well as the contributed papers, those complaints hint the varied discussions that shaped a vital part of the workshop. They represent a major and particular documentary foundation for researchers and radioactive waste administration specialists. Themes addressed comprise tasks to destiny generations, timescales for rules, stepwise choice making, roles of optimisation and top to be had strategies (BAT), a number of strains of reasoning, safeguard and function signs, acceptance of uncertainties and the significance of stakeholder interactions.

Show description

Read Online or Download Radioactive Waste Management: Towards Transparent, Proportionate And Deliverable Regulation For Geological Disposal PDF

Best nonfiction_6 books

The Beginnings of Plant Hybridization

Hardback, ex-library, with traditional stamps and markings, in reasonable all around situation, appropriate as a research reproduction.

Conjugated Polymers: Processing and Applications (Handbook of Conducting Polymers)

Many major basic recommendations and useful functions have built because the booklet of the best-selling moment variation of the guide of accomplishing Polymers. Now divided into books, the 3rd variation keeps to maintain the superb services of the editors and world-renowned individuals whereas supplying stronger insurance of the hot advances in polymer processing and functions, rather in conductivity, nonlinear optics, and light-weight emission.

Additional resources for Radioactive Waste Management: Towards Transparent, Proportionate And Deliverable Regulation For Geological Disposal

Example text

It improves the regulator’s necessary competence to review the safety case allowing it to rely on the scientific community. It provides the regulator’s independence, allowing a different view on the safety case from the implementer’s view. By bringing to the fore the scientific and technical ability of the regulator, R&D work by the regulator provides additional confidence to the stakeholders in the credibility of the regulator. , to fill scientific gaps. The question whether or not it is the duty of the regulator to carry out such complementary work is the subject of controversial discussions.

The session at this workshop was intended to prepare the ground for a wider-ranging discussion on the role of regulatory research within the RF. Hans Wanner, Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) made a presentation on the “Needs of Research for Regulatory Purposes”. H. Wanner presented a general overview of regulatory research at the international level based on a preliminary input from international colleagues and observed that the question of active involvement of nuclear regulatory and supervisory bodies in R&D projects has become a topic of increasing interest in recent years even if the way in which research is included in regulatory activities varies from country to country.

These scenarios should be site specific and based on current practices, taking into account the proximity to resources of potential interest for future generations. There was a broad consensus that the results of stylised analyses of human intrusion scenarios can contribute to the demonstration of the repository system’s robustness in a safety case. There were diverging opinions on the question of whether drilling into the plume release of the repository should be regarded as human intrusion or if human intrusion scenarios should be restricted to direct intrusion into the repository/radioactive waste.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.39 of 5 – based on 24 votes